Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03392
Original file (BC 2013 03392.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03392

  XXXXXXXXXXX 	COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 11 Jul 13 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was injured while completing the contended assessment; the resulting scores were unjustly entered into AFFMS. 

In support of his appeal the applicant submits; an AF Form 108 Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing indicating that he was referred to base medical on the same day as the test. Additionally, he submits an AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Report dated 1 Aug 13 with the following restrictions: no 1.5 mile run, no 1.0 mile walk.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On the date of the contested FA the applicant was serving as a Technical Sergeant (E-6) in the regular Air Force. 

On 11 Jul 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA, attaining an overall composite score of 34.80, which constituted an “unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio – 14:08/0.00, Abdominal Circumference – 31”/20.00 points, Push-ups - 55/8.80, Sit-ups – 42/6.00 points.

On 17 Jul 13 the applicant successfully retested with exemptions in all but the abdominal circumference portion of the assessment. 

On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), citing insufficient evidence and there was no letter from the commander invalidating the Fitness Assessment.

In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within 5 duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider/MLO and the Exercise Physiologist.  If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided.
________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the contested FAs in AFFMS due to lack of supporting evidence.  DPSIM states, the applicant did not provide documentation from the unit commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA in accordance with AFI 36-2905, (AFGM5), paragraph 13, (20 Dec 10).

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Mar 14 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, a majority of the Board believe he has met his burden of establishing the contested FA should be declared void. The FAAB disapproved the request, stating that while there was evidence to support her medical condition a commander invalidation letter was not provided and AFPC/DPSIM recommended denial based on lack of supporting evidence.  While the applicant has not provided a letter from his commander invalidating the FA, he has provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that he did in fact have a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA.  Furthermore, the applicant provided an AF Form 469 dated the same day as the FA and indicating that he was placed on a profile for an injury that occurred during the assessment. Given the evidence, it is apparent the applicant’s ability to complete the FA was hindered by an illness/injury.  In view of this and noting that other than the contested FA, his FA history over the last five years reflects “Satisfactory” or “Excellent” on all FAs to date, a majority of the Board finds a totality of the evidence supports favorable consideration of this request.  Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment, dated 11 July 2013 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03392 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
	XXXXXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXXXXX, Member

By majority vote, the Board voted to correct the records, as recommended.  XXXXXXXXXXX voted to deny the applicant's request and has submitted a minority report which is at Exhibit D. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03392 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Jul 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 5 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 14.
	Exhibit D.  Minority Report, dated 7 Aug 14.




                                   XXXXXXXXXXX
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03684

    Original file (BC 2013 03684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Report issued after the contested FA supports his claim of an injury. The AF Form 469 also restricts him from the cardio portion of an FA for the period of 29 May 13 to 23 Jul 13. While an invalidation letter from the commander and an AF FM 422 was not submitted, a majority of the Board recognize the applicant submitted a personal statement and an AF Form 469 signed by his medical provider, indicating that he injured his ankle during the contested FA, which did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279

    Original file (BC 2013 05279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04034

    Original file (BC 2013 04034.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Feb 14, the applicant’s request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB). The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Feb 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03350

    Original file (BC 2013 03350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. On 7 Apr 14 the applicant submitted a letter from his commander, with attachments, requesting that the contested FA be removed from the record (Exhibit C). However, in response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submits a letter from his commander requesting the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05052

    Original file (BC 2013 05052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his contentions, he submits a Primary Care Manager Memorandum dated 8 Jul 13, recommending the contested FA be invalidated and noting the applicant was cleared to retake the FA within 10 duty days, due to a pending profile; a Duty Limiting Condition Report (AF Form 469), dated 8 Jul 13, and a Fitness Assessment Score Sheet, dated 15 Jul 13. The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 31 Jan 14 88.00 Satisfactory 15 Jul...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02467

    Original file (BC 2013 02467.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 Jan 14, the request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical documentation from an Air Force doctor.” In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM5 (3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04200

    Original file (BC 2013 04200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a pre-existing medical condition, which should have placed him on profile during the contested FA In support of his appeal the applicant submits; a Medical Determination letter, signed by his medical provider on 30 Apr 13, which states the applicant “had a documented medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of the FA test.” The applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02337

    Original file (BC 2013 02337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02337 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 20 Dec 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In support of her appeal she submits an AF Form 469 Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 11 Mar 13, indicating she...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04664

    Original file (BC 2013 04664.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating “There was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicant’s medical provider.” In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM4&5 (26 Jun 13 & 3 Jan 13), Attachment 1, Section 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...